Dr Robert Ebert – Pinpointing the Physics of Energetic Storm Particles Observed in Near Earth Orbit
When the Sun’s surrounding corona erupts, colossal streams of charged particles are ejected out into interplanetary space, and go on to interact with the material that resides there. Dr Robert Ebert at the Southwest Research Institute and his colleagues combine observations from spacecraft with the latest computer models to uncover the mysteries of these interactions. Their research focuses on advancing astronomers’ understanding of the highly energetic processes that play out in the void that comprises over 99% of the Solar System’s volume.
Energetic Storm Particle Events
Interplanetary space is home to vast numbers of charged particles, which spend most of their time being transported through the Solar System. Occasionally, however, large-scale astronomical events can drastically change their behaviour. Such events include energetic bursts of plasma originating from the Sun known as Coronal Mass Ejections (CMEs), which are thought to be caused by the intricate behaviours of the Sun’s magnetic field. When interplanetary ions interact with these CMEs, they become shocked, and are accelerated to extremely high energies.
Ions accelerated at shocks associated with CMEs observed near Earth are known as energetic storm particles (ESPs). Astronomers believe that these accelerations are likely affected by a variety of factors, including the speed, strength, orientation, and magnetic turbulence of the CME shocks that caused them. Currently, however, our understanding of the process is far from complete and requires further research.
When a CME interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field, it can release vast amounts of energy, creating particularly strong and beautiful aurora in the Earth’s polar regions, but it can also cause significant disruption to satellites and electrical transmissions, as well as health issues for astronauts.
Without a complete knowledge of the physics behind these events, attempts to prepare for them will be incomplete, making our global communications networks more vulnerable. To fill these gaps in our awareness, Dr Robert Ebert at the Southwest Research Institute acknowledges that a combination of detailed observations from spacecraft with sophisticated computer modelling is urgently needed.
Learning from Observations
Over the past few decades, astronomers have used observations of ESP events to make a variety of predictions about their connections with the properties of shocks caused by CMEs. For example, the range of energies to which particles become accelerated, known as their spectra, is thought to be dependent on the density of shocked interstellar material, while the orientation of the shock is predicted to have a strong influence on the abundances of the particles it contains. Furthermore, the properties of ESPs are believed to depend on magnetic turbulence ‘upstream’ from the shock.
In a 2016 study, Dr Ebert and his colleagues aimed to learn more about the properties of ESPs themselves, by observing them from two separate spacecraft. In their study, the craft took their observations at the same distance from the Sun as Earth’s orbit, but at different longitudes – or distances parallel to the Sun’s equator. By doing this, the researchers hoped to uncover longitudinal variations in the relationships between the properties of interplanetary shocks caused by CMEs, and ions of oxygen and iron, during ESP events.
Their discoveries included the fact that as ESP events progress, their intensities varied significantly between the measurements of each spacecraft. On the other hand, properties including shock speed, density, and magnetic field compression and orientation, showed little organisation with longitude. Yet despite these discoveries, a variety of properties remained unexplained, which called for a more detailed examination in future research.
Identifying Gaps in Understanding
Leading on from this study, Dr Ebert and his colleagues have identified a variety of areas that could potentially lead to new insights into the physical mechanisms underlying ESP accelerations by CME shocks. Several theories in the past have attempted to link the properties of energetic particles with those of local shocks in the interplanetary medium. So far, however, these efforts have been unable to precisely predict the intensities of ion accelerations indicative of ESPs. In addition, they haven’t yet consistently determined the spectra of ESPs, along with the overall abundances of the ions they contain.
In the face of these challenges, Dr Ebert and his colleagues aim to compare the properties of interplanetary shocks, turbulence, and source material, with the intensities, spectra, and ionic abundances of associated ESP events. To pinpoint the physical drivers of these ESP properties, they have identified three key questions, to be answered through analysis incorporating both computer models and spacecraft observations.
The first of their questions is: what is the relationship between locally observed shock properties, and ESP properties such as intensities, spectra, and abundances? The second is: how does magnetic turbulence situated upstream from the shock, and the presence of ions that act as ‘seeds’ for particle acceleration, affect the properties of ESPs? And finally: what is the cause of variability both between separate ESP events, and within individual events, as observed from longitudinally separated spacecraft?
By addressing each of these questions in turn, Dr Ebert hopes to advance astronomers’ current understanding of the physics that plays out as interplanetary particles are accelerated by CMEs. However, in order to find these solutions, another experimental step needs to be taken. Since the physical mechanisms that trigger particular ESP properties are so complex, and may depend on multiple parameters, the team has enlisted the help of a tool that many other branches of astronomy have turned to in recent years: the power of computer modelling.
Enlisting Computer Models
To answer their three questions, Dr Ebert and his colleagues now plan to use an advanced computer model named ‘Particle Acceleration and Transport in the Inner Heliosphere’ (PATH). The model is highly sophisticated, and has already been used by many astronomers studying the properties of the environment surrounding our host star during CMEs. Clearly, however, PATH would still be useless if it were not given the right instructions. In this case, Dr Ebert’s team plans to use ESP and CME shock data gathered by real spacecraft to act as PATH’s inputs.
With this setup, they are able to systematically vary the different aspects of shock acceleration within the model, and then observe their influence on the resulting ESP intensities, spectra and abundances. This allows them to isolate the CME properties responsible for particular physical aspects of ESP production and their properties. The researchers also acknowledge that PATH would allow them to model selected ESP events from the vantage points of different spacecraft, allowing them to identify the mechanisms responsible for longitudinal variations in some properties of ESPs, as observed by Dr Ebert in his 2016 study.
This modelling framework gives the researchers a suitable basis for laying out descriptions of what they needed to measure, the tasks these measurements would address, and the expected results of their analysis.
Advancing our knowledge of ESPs
The first of these questions regarded the relationship between the plasma and magnetic properties of shocks with those properties of the ESP event as a whole. Dr Ebert’s team predicts that solving this issue would require them to systematically study the influence of interplanetary shocks on ESP properties using the PATH model, and to survey several dozen ESP events within the solar cycle.
If carried out correctly, the team expects to identify whether the speed of interplanetary shocks, their strength as measured by density and magnetic field enhancements, and their orientation relative to the interplanetary magnetic field, can influence the intensities, energy spectra, and ionic abundances of ESP events.
The second question asks how magnetic turbulence and the presence of ions with energies above the nominal solar wind upstream of the shock may affect the properties of ESPs. Dr Ebert’s team uses spacecraft observations and the sophisticated modelling capabilities of PATH to identify the conditions under which upstream turbulence, and the energy spectra of seed particles, affect ESP intensities, spectra and abundances.
Finally, the third question considers why there are clear differences between different ESP events, and even between single events from the perspectives of different spacecraft. Dr Ebert’s team proposes that this could be answered by using PATH to model ESP events from the vantage points of different spacecraft that are longitudinally separated in space. They would then compare the results of the simulations with real spacecraft observations. The team expects that this would allow them to uncover the causes of variability in ESP intensities, spectra and abundances between these events.
A Roadmap to Future Discoveries
Having set out these clear goals, Dr Ebert and his colleagues believe they have developed a strong basis for advancing our understanding of CME-driven ion accelerations. Their roadmap lays the foundations for a three-year research project, in which they will combine data analysis with the latest efforts in computer modelling.
By setting out these goals, the researchers have a reliable roadmap for uncovering the mysteries surrounding the colossal, highly energetic processes that play out in the vastness of space. With further research, they could also allow for developments of crucial safeguards to our global communications networks against the damaging effects of CMEs and the energetic particles associated with them.
Meet the researcher
Dr Robert W. Ebert
Space Science and Engineering Division
Southwest Research Institute
San Antonio, TX USA
Assistant Adjoint Professor
Department of Physics and Astronomy
University of Texas at San Antonio
San Antonio, TX USA
Dr Ebert completed his PhD in Space Physics at the University of Texas at San Antonio in 2010. His research now focuses on the physics of plasma and energetic particles in interplanetary space and Jupiter’s magnetosphere. He is currently the plasma ion sensor lead for the Jovian Auroral Distributions Experiment on Juno and has contributed to the pre- and post-flight calibration of flight instruments on several NASA missions. He has recently developed SmallSat mission concepts to study the solar wind’s interaction with Jupiter’s magnetosphere and the space environment around Mars.
T: +1 210-522-2229
Maher Dayeh (Southwest Research Institute)
Mihir Desai (Southwest Research Institute)
Lan Jian (NASA Goddard Space Flight Center)
Gang Li (University of Alabama in Huntsville)
Charles Smith (University of New Hampshire)
NASA – Heliophysics Supporting Research (Grant)
NASA – Living with a Star Research (Grant)
RW Elbert, MA Dayeh, MI Desai, LK Jian, G Li, GM Mason, Multi-spacecraft analysis of energetic heavy ion and interplanetary shock properties in energetic storm particle events near 1au, The Astrophysical Journal, 2016, 831, 21.
MA Dayeh, MI Desai, RW Ebert, HA Elliott, A Farahat, K Kozarev, and G Li, What causes the variability in the properties of energetic storm particle (ESP) events?, 17th Annual International Astrophysics Conference, IOP Conference Series, Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 1100, 012008, (2018).
J Hu, G Li, S Fu, G Zank, and Z Ao, Modeling a single SEP event from multiple vantage points using the iPATH model, The Astrophysical Journal Letters, 854, L19 (2018).
Creative Commons Licence
(CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More articles you may like
The state of Michigan is experiencing numerous environmental threats, risking the health and wellbeing of its residents. STEM professionals are urgently needed to help solve these problems and mitigate the impending public health disasters. However, the number of students graduating with STEM degrees in the state has been declining. Researchers at Siena Heights University are addressing this need through their teaching and development program, SHAPE STEM, which aims to increase the recruitment and retention of low-income academically talented students in STEM subjects.
Tropical forests and marine ecosystems in the Caribbean are biodiversity hotspots and home to many species found nowhere else on Earth. Increasing environmental stress from a changing climate, such as hurricanes, temperature rises and droughts, threaten to irreparably alter these precious systems. Coupled with ongoing pressures from human activities, some of these areas are especially at risk. Dr Jess Zimmerman and his colleagues at the University of Puerto Rico and throughout the US aim to provide the basis for predicting the future of these ecosystems, through their research at the Luquillo Experimental Forest in north-eastern Puerto Rico.
Genetically modified crops can offer a range of environmental and health benefits, such as reduced usage of chemical pesticides, improved farm efficiency and crop yields, and an enhanced nutritional profile. Despite this, fears surrounding genetic modification have led to a lack of acceptance of these foods by many consumers, regulators, and governmental organisations. Dr Richard Goodman from the Food Allergy Research and Resource Program at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln, is helping to shift the narrative around genetically modified crops, through his extensive work evaluating their safety.
Professor David Magnuson, at the University of Louisville, Kentucky, describes himself as ‘a CPG guy’ and occasionally, more informally as ‘a rat guy!’ His work on the function of the central pattern generator (CPG) in the rat spinal cord following spinal cord injury, has produced both surprising and thought-provoking results. This research may ultimately challenge the established clinical beliefs and practices around the ways to best rehabilitate human patients with severe spinal cord injury.