Dr Wilber Sabiiti | Battling Tuberculosis whilst Maintaining the Respiratory Microbiome
In the world of respiratory health, treating tuberculosis infections is an ongoing challenge. Dr Wilber Sabiiti from the University of St Andrews in the UK, delves into the impact of various tuberculosis treatments on the intricate community of microorganisms residing in the respiratory tract. He explores the impact of seven different treatment regimens and their effects on the microbiome, which is crucial for maintaining respiratory health and well-being.
Tackling a Killer Infection
Tuberculosis (TB) is an infectious disease primarily impacting the lungs, caused by the bacteria, Mycobacterium tuberculosis. It is transmitted through the air when individuals with the infection cough or sneeze. Fortunately, TB can be cured with a cocktail of antibiotics – but without treatment, it can be fatal. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), in 2022, 1.3 million people sadly succumbed to the infection. WHO highlights that TB is the second leading killer infection after COVID-19, and ending the TB pandemic is amongst the targets of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.
One significant issue with TB is the development of multidrug-resistant strains of the bacteria, where our current antibiotics are no longer effective in treating the infection. WHO describes this as a public health crisis and health security threat. Research into novel antibiotic combinations is ongoing, but unfortunately, these treatments also impact the ‘good’ bacteria that reside in the respiratory tract, which could have critical health consequences further down the line.
Dr Wilber Sabiiti carries out his research in the Division of Infection and Global Health at the School of Medicine in the University of St Andrews, where he investigates new antibiotic combinations and their impact on the respiratory microbiome as well as TB infection.
The Respiratory Microbiome
The respiratory microbiota (the different microorganisms found in the airways) act as a defender of respiratory health by influencing the body’s immune system and providing resistance to harmful microbes that might try to colonise the respiratory tract. Imbalances in the microbiome (the community of microorganisms), known as dysbiosis, can occur due to various diseases and antibiotic use.
Dr Sabiiti explains that the lungs are a non-sterile environment, even for people in good health. The typical diversity in the microbiota of the human lung differs in abundance and prevalence among individuals. Factors such as age, diet, and disease contribute to variations in the microbiome. Conditions like lung cancer and TB are linked to alterations in the microbiome, marked by shifts in certain microbial groups. He adds that a standard first-line treatment for TB, HRZE (a combination of the antibiotics isoniazid, rifampicin, pyrazinamide, and ethambutol) for 2 months followed by 4 months of isoniazid and rifampicin does not seem to affect the overall microbiome diversity but certainly leads to a decrease in the numbers of some immunologically important ‘good’ bacteria.
Dr Sabiiti highlights that this effect on the microbiome could have long-term consequences on the patient’s health. He adds that using shorter courses of antibiotics would lessen the length of time the microbiome is exposed, therefore helping to minimise the damage. As such, TB research is starting to focus on developing new short-term antibiotic regimens.
Exploring Treatment Regimens
In order to gain a deeper understanding of the impact of antibiotic combinations on the respiratory microbiome, Dr Sabiiti and his colleagues investigated seven anti-tuberculosis treatment regimens. He explains that they analysed the sputum of the patients to find out about their microbiome. The team analysed the sputum microbiome of patients with TB who had been treated with six experimental regimens and compared them against that of patients who received standard treatments as part of two clinical trials: HIGHRIF study 2 and PanACEA MAMS-TB trial.
Dr Sabiiti says the experimental antibiotic regimens consisted of different combinations of rifampicin (R), isoniazid (H), pyrazinamide (Z), ethambutol (E), moxifloxacin (M), and a new drug, SQ109 (Q). He adds that they used genetic material (RNA) found in the sputum and a particular method called the Illumina metagenomics technique to identify the genomes and, in turn, the microbes present in the samples. This was followed by further analysis to uncover the differences in the microbiomes, pre and post-treatment with each regimen.
Sparing the Microbiota
Dr Sabiiti explains that 397 pre- and post-treatment sputum samples were taken from seven treatment regimes in total. The team reported that pre-treatment microbiomes were dominated by the bacterial groups, Firmicutes and Streptococcus. Dr Sabiiti highlights that two regimens (HR20mg/kgZM and HR35mg/kgZE), in particular, showed a significant depressing effect on the microbiome following two weeks of treatment. He adds that certain types of bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, were the most sensitive to the killing effects of the antibiotics, with the highest number of species suppressed being in the regimen containing the antibiotic known as moxifloxacin.
The team also found that by the twelfth week after treatment was started, the microbiomes had returned to the pre-treatment levels apart from one regimen (HR35mg/kgZE), and for the Mycobacterium species which did not recover in any regimen used (this was bacteria the treatments were targeting). Dr Sabiiti and his colleagues concluded that out of all the combinations they reviewed, the HR20mg/kgZM regimen was effective in treating TB but without limiting the recovery of the microbiome. He says these data imply that a shorter antibiotic regimen with better outcomes could be achieved without harming the ‘good’ bacteria, the microbiota.
The Future of the Microbiome
Dr Sabiiti notes that whilst the microbiome can recover after exposure to antibiotics, the speed of recovery varies with different treatment plans. Broad-spectrum antibiotics (targeting a wide range of different bacteria) have a significant negative impact on the microbial community, but adjusting the dosage can minimise this effect. He stresses that it is essential to include microbiome analysis when evaluating and approving new antibiotics or treatment combinations.
Their report highlighted that future research, incorporating a large sample size and examining long-term clinical outcomes, is critical to establishing microbiome analysis as a parameter for drug safety in clinical trials. Further exploration is required to determine whether microbiome recovery during antibiotic treatment is due to replenishment from the diet, for example, and not due to the development of antibiotic-resistant genes.
Dr Sabiiti also explains their research has highlighted the importance of utilising RNA instead of DNA to examine the microbiome and its response to antibiotic treatment. RNA reflects cell viability, so it is essential for studying the impact of antibiotics on the microbiota. He adds that these insights enhance our understanding of how novel anti-tuberculosis treatments influence the microbiome, opening up the door for the development of new and improved regimens.
SHARE
DOWNLOAD E-BOOK
REFERENCE
https://doi.org/10.33548/SCIENTIA1181
MEET THE RESEARCHER
Dr Wilber Sabiiti
Division of Infection and Global Health
School of Medicine
University of St Andrews
St Andrews
KY16 9TF
UK
Dr Wilber Sabiiti obtained his BSc in Biochemistry and Zoology from Makerere University, Uganda, and his MSc in Molecular Biology at Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Belgium, in 2008. In 2012, he completed his PhD in Bioscience and Infectious Diseases at the University of Birmingham in the UK. He is currently a Principal Research Fellow in Medicine (Associate Professor) at the University of St Andrews, where he specialises in diagnostic and treatment response biomarkers, antimicrobial resistance, and translating research into policy and practice. He is a member of several colleges of experts and panels, including the National Institute for Health and Care Research College of Experts for the Global Effort on COVID-19, UKRI MRC Applied Global Health Board, Africa Research Excellency Fund, and Commonwealth Scholarship Commission Academic Advisors’ panel. He chairs the St Andrews Africa Health Research (StAAHR) network and co-chairs the Immunology and Diagnostics Expert Working Group of the Coalition for Equitable Research in Low Resource Settings (CERCLE), Geneva, Switzerland, as well as being the academic editor of the East Africa Science and PLoS Global Public Health Journals.
CONTACT
E: ws31@st-andrews.ac.uk
W: https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/medicine/people/ws31/
X: @SabiitiwWilber, @Infection_StAn
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/dr-wilber-sabiiti-2b8020137/
KEY COLLABORATORS
Professor Stephen H Gillespie, University of St Andrews, UK
Professor Martin Boeree, Radboud University Netherlands & Co-ordinator PanACEA II
Professor Norbert Heinrich, University of Munich, Germany
Professor Gibson Sammy Kibiki, Kilimanjaro Clinical Research Institute, Tanzania/East African Health Research Commission, Burundi/Africa Research Excellency Fund, UK
Dr Nyanda Elias Ntinginya, National Institute for Medical Research, Tanzania
FUNDING
European and Developing Countries Clinical Trials Partnership (EDCTP)
FURTHER READING
E Musisi, A Wyness, S Eldirdiri, et al., Effect of seven anti-tuberculosis treatment regimens on sputum microbiome: a retrospective analysis of the HIGHRIF study 2 and PanACEA MAMS-TB clinical trials, Lancet Microbe, 2023, 4(11), e913–e922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(23)00191-X
REPUBLISH OUR ARTICLES
We encourage all formats of sharing and republishing of our articles. Whether you want to host on your website, publication or blog, we welcome this. Find out more
Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Follow Us
MORE ARTICLES YOU MAY LIKE
The Economic Case for Prevention: Michigan Research Team Shows Diabetes Prevention Programmes Pay Dividends
For decades, healthcare systems have focused primarily on treating diseases rather than preventing them. Now, groundbreaking research from the University of Michigan demonstrates that investing in prevention – particularly for type 2 diabetes – can improve health outcomes and significantly reduce costs. Their comprehensive studies provide compelling evidence that could reshape how we approach chronic diseases.
Fostering Innovation in Healthcare Through Collaborative Learning and Research
Healthcare systems worldwide face mounting pressures from rising costs, ageing populations, and increasingly complex patient needs. To address these challenges, researchers at the All-Wales Intensive Learning Academy for Innovation in Health and Social Care at Swansea University are exploring innovative approaches that deliver better value in healthcare provision. The team led by Dr Daniel Rees and Dr Roderick Thomas are leading efforts to develop new models of collaborative learning and research that bring together healthcare providers, industry partners, and academic institutions to drive innovation in health and social care.
Epigenetic Mysteries Unravelled: The Zinc-Finger Proteins
Exploring the complex mechanisms of cell development processes and DNA structure is critical to understanding how certain diseases, such as cancer, can arise. Professor Danny Reinberg and Dr Havva Ortabozkoyun from the University of Miami in Florida, USA, work to reveal the epigenetic mechanisms at play during cell division and development and, in turn, disease processes. Together, they are discovering new protein molecules involved in genome organisation, deepening our understanding of how cancers and other related conditions can develop.
International Isocyanate Institute | TDI-induced Asthma: Reanalysing Data to Find Hidden Trends
Even if you’ve never heard of them, you’ve used polyurethanes. Producing them requires toluene diisocyanates, which may/can induce asthma when inhaled. A 5-year study claimed to conclude that cumulative TDI exposure over time was indicative of asthma incidence. However, a reanalysis by a team at the International Isocyanate Institute points the finger instead at the frequency of unprotected high-exposure events, like accidental spills or plant maintenance. This finding guides the way for future advances in worker safety.