Dr Anette Kolmos | Rethinking Project Types in Engineering Education
As the world faces increasingly complex challenges, engineering education must evolve to prepare students for interdisciplinary collaboration. Researchers at Aalborg University, led by Dr Anette Kolmos, have developed a new framework for categorising different types of student projects, with the goal of fostering the skills needed to tackle real-world problems.
Interdisciplinary Engineering for the Future
In an increasingly interconnected world, engineers are being called upon to develop innovative solutions to complex global challenges like climate change and sustainable development. However, many engineering programmes still focus primarily on discipline-specific technical skills rather than the interdisciplinary collaboration and systems thinking needed to address these multifaceted issues.
To help bridge this gap, researchers at Aalborg University in Denmark have developed a new framework for categorising different types of student projects in engineering education. Their goal is to create a more nuanced understanding of how various project structures can build interdisciplinary competencies and prepare students for the realities of professional engineering work.
Led by Dr Anette Kolmos, Professor of Engineering Education and Problem-Based Learning, the research team conducted an in-depth study of student experiences across several novel project formats implemented at Aalborg University. Based on their findings, they propose six distinct project types that offer a progression from narrowly focused disciplinary work to broad interdisciplinary collaboration.
Building Bridges Between Disciplines
The foundation for the new framework came from Aalborg University’s decades of experience with problem- and project-based learning (PBL) in engineering education. Under this model, students spend about half their study time working in teams on semester-long projects, typically within their own discipline.
While this approach has proven effective for developing technical and collaborative skills, Dr Kolmos and her colleagues recognised the need to push students beyond disciplinary boundaries. In 2019, the university launched its first ‘Megaprojects’ – large-scale interdisciplinary initiatives bringing together students from multiple faculties to work on complex sustainability challenges.
Through extensive interviews and observations, the researchers identified several key challenges students faced in the Megaprojects. These included difficulties aligning different programmes’ structures and timelines, transforming disciplinary project skills to an interdisciplinary context, and bridging epistemological differences between fields.
A Spectrum of Collaboration
Based on their findings, Dr Kolmos and her team developed a framework defining six distinct project types. These range from narrowly focused discipline projects to large-scale interdisciplinary initiatives addressing complex societal challenges across multiple faculties. The progression moves from single-discipline focus to increasingly broad interdisciplinary collaboration, while also incorporating varying scales of teamwork from individual project groups to networks of multiple teams.
Dr Kolmos explains that each project type offers unique learning opportunities and challenges. By exposing students to this range of collaborative structures throughout their education, they can be better prepared for the diversity of real-world engineering work.
Putting Theory into Practice
To test and refine their framework, the researchers worked with Aalborg University to study new project formats which form the empirical base of their model. These included ‘leadENG’ projects bringing together students from different engineering programmes, as well as intensive ‘Hackathon’ events with interdisciplinary teams tackling industry challenges.
Dr Kolmos and her colleagues conducted in-depth qualitative studies of student experiences in these new formats. Their findings highlighted both the value and the challenges of interdisciplinary collaboration at different scales. Students in the leadENG projects reported significant benefits from working across engineering disciplines, gaining new perspectives on their own field and developing a better understanding of how different specialities contribute to complex systems.
However, the researchers also found that students often struggled to transfer their project management and collaboration skills from disciplinary to interdisciplinary contexts. This underscored the need for explicit instruction and scaffolding to support interdisciplinary teamwork. Dr Kolmos emphasises that skills developed in disciplinary projects do not automatically translate to interdisciplinary settings, necessitating deliberate cultivation of competencies for working across boundaries.
Real-World Implementation
A key strength of Dr Kolmos and her team’s research is its grounding in real-world educational practice. By working closely with university administrators and faculty to implement and study new project formats, they were able to refine their framework based on concrete student experiences.
This action research approach allowed the researchers to not only develop theoretical models but also provide practical guidance for educators looking to enhance interdisciplinary learning. Their findings have already informed curriculum changes at Aalborg University and are drawing interest from engineering programmes worldwide.
Dr Routhe stresses that successfully implementing more interdisciplinary projects requires careful consideration of factors like curriculum alignment, student preparation, and faculty support. The team’s research highlights the importance of scaffolding students’ progression from disciplinary to interdisciplinary work, rather than expecting them to make the leap in a single step.
As they continue to refine and expand their framework, Dr Kolmos and her colleagues are exploring several promising avenues for future research. One key area of interest is investigating how students can more effectively transform collaborative skills between different project contexts.
Preparing Tomorrow’s Engineers
As the global challenges facing society grow increasingly complex, the ability to work across disciplinary boundaries is becoming ever more crucial for engineers. Dr Kolmos and her team’s research provides a valuable roadmap for engineering educators looking to cultivate these essential skills in their students.
By offering a nuanced framework for understanding different types of collaborative projects, their work helps bridge the gap between educational theory and practice. As more engineering programmes adopt interdisciplinary approaches, frameworks like this will be essential for guiding curriculum development and preparing students for the realities of modern engineering work.
As the team members continue to refine and expand their work, they are helping to shape a new generation of engineers equipped to tackle the complex, interconnected challenges of the 21st century. By rethinking project types and collaborative structures, they are laying the groundwork for an engineering education that truly prepares students for the interdisciplinary nature of real-world problem-solving.
SHARE
DOWNLOAD E-BOOK
REFERENCE
https://doi.org/10.33548/SCIENTIA1130
MEET THE RESEARCHERS

Dr Anette Kolmos
Department of Planning, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
Dr Anette Kolmos is a Professor in Engineering Education and PBL at Aalborg University, Denmark. She was the Founding Director of the UNESCO Centre for Problem Based Learning in Engineering Science and Sustainability, and has extensive research experience in engineering education, amassing over 350 publications to date.

Dr Jette Egelund Holgaard is an Associate Professor specialising in Problem Based Learning in Engineering Education at Aalborg University. Her research focuses on the relationship between problem-based learning (PBL) competencies, interdisciplinarity, and societal challenges in reshaping engineering education.

Dr Henrik Worm Routhe is a PhD fellow at the Aalborg Centre for Problem Based Learning in Engineering Science and Sustainability. With 30 years of industry experience, his research interests include engineering education, knowledge transformation, and PBL competencies.

Maiken Winther is a PhD candidate at the Aalborg Centre for Problem Based Learning in Engineering Science and Sustainability. Her research focuses on complexity and interdisciplinary collaboration in PBL environments.

Dr Lykke Bertel is an Associate Professor at the Aalborg Centre for Problem-based Learning in Engineering Science and Sustainability. Her research interests include PBL, lifelong learning, emerging technologies, and AI in education.
CONTACT
E: ak@plan.aau.dk
W: https://vbn.aau.dk/da/projects/interdisciplinary-pbl-methodologies-in-engineering-education-and-
X: https://www.linkedin.com/in/anettekolmos/
FUNDING
Poul Due Jensen Foundation
Grundfos Foundation
FURTHER READING
A Kolmos, JE Holgaard, HW Routhe, et al., Interdisciplinary project types in engineering education, European Journal of Engineering Education, 2024, 49(2), 257–282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2267476
HW Routhe, JE Holgaard, A Kolmos, Experienced Learning Outcomes for Interdisciplinary Projects in Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Education, 2023, 66(5), 487–499. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TE.2023.3284835

REPUBLISH OUR ARTICLES
We encourage all formats of sharing and republishing of our articles. Whether you want to host on your website, publication or blog, we welcome this. Find out more
Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
SUBSCRIBE NOW
Follow Us
MORE ARTICLES YOU MAY LIKE
Dr Kenric Nelson | Modelling the Extreme: A New Technique for Training Risk-Aware Artificial Intelligence
Category 5 hurricanes, financial crashes, and global pandemics are just a few examples of rare events whose high risks necessitate understanding and mitigation. Developments in artificial intelligence (AI) could go a long way towards improving our ability to model and mitigate the impacts of such extreme events, but current training methods are often unable to deal effectively with outliers in data – which is exactly what extreme events are. If outliers are present in training data, they skew the AI’s expectations, but if they’re omitted entirely, models will wrongly assume they never occur. To address this shortcoming, the Photrek team, led by Dr Kenric Nelson, has developed a new training technique to design more robust AI systems that can cope with rare, extreme events.
Revolutionising Chemical Safety: How AI Could Replace Animal Testing
Modern life exposes us to a staggering array of synthetic substances—over 350,000 chemicals are registered for use worldwide, found in products as diverse as pesticides, plastics, cosmetics, and pharmaceuticals. Ensuring the safety of all these compounds is a daunting task. Researchers led by Prof Jinhee Choi at University of Seoul are developing cutting-edge artificial intelligence models to predict the potential dangers toxicity of chemicals, with the aim of reducing the need for controversial animal experiments. By analysing vast toxicology databases and pioneering new AI techniques, Prof Choi’s team is working towards a future where the safety of everything from industrial compounds to household products can be assessed more quickly, cheaply, and humanely.
Dr Philipp Jordt | Finding the Best Way for Large Research Facilities to Handle All Their Data
As technology advances, physical experiments are performed by bigger, more powerful, and more sophisticated machines. Research conducted using these large-scale facilities (LSF) typically involves collaboration between the operating staff, instrument scientists, and external research groups, who propose specific experiments to be performed. With many people involved and such large volumes of data generated by each experiment, it has become challenging to make sure that results are collected, catalogued, stored, and distributed efficiently.
The German consortium DAPHNE4NFDI has been working to integrate Electronic Laboratory Notebooks (ELNs) into the Photon and Neutron (PaN) research community. One of their main goals has been to develop the decision-making process behind how research facilities, universities, and researchers can evaluate the range of ELNs available and decide on which solution to integrate into their operations.
Putting AI in your Ears with 3D Neural Networks
It’s difficult to communicate with someone when neither of you speak the same language; apps and online tools like Google Translate can help to bridge the gap, but they hardly make for a natural conversation. However, the rise of artificial intelligence (AI) has opened the door for the development of speech-to-speech technology, where spoken language is translated instantly in real time. To bring this idea closer to reality, a collaboration of European researchers led by Professor Cristell Maneux at the University of Bordeaux have proposed concepts for a 3D artificial neural network accelerator. This ultra-compact, highly efficient design could enable the construction of standalone earpieces capable of translating spoken language instantly, with no need for internet access.
Ongoing research by Professor Han Lamers (University of Oslo) and Professor Bettina Reitz-Joosse (University of Groningen) reveals how Fascist Italy weaponized ancient Rome’s language to legitimise its power and connect Mussolini’s regime to Italy’s imperial past. Their projects involve collaboration with an international team of mostly junior researchers based in Norway, the Netherlands, Austria, and Italy.




