Worldwide Cancer Research
The arrival of COVID-19 changed the world as we knew it. Global priorities underwent seismic shifts and measures to prevent the spread of COVID-19 changed our daily and working lives beyond recognition. In this exclusive interview, we speak with Worldwide Cancer Research’s Director of Research, Dr Lynn Turner, to hear how the pandemic has impacted the ongoing battle against cancer, and what challenges must now be faced as a result.
Could you explain how individuals with cancer have been affected by the pandemic?
We know from reports, studies and analysis conducted over the past year that people with cancer have been heavily impacted by the pandemic. We are concerned that people with cancer are in danger of becoming collateral damage as a result of everyone’s attention being focussed on ‘the other C’ – COVID-19. Across the UK, the pandemic has led to delays in diagnosis and treatment, which researchers estimate could lead to anywhere between 7,000 and 18,000 additional deaths from cancer in 2021. We also saw early in the nationwide lockdown that there was a significant decline in the number of people being referred to emergency cancer services. This is truly worrying and it’s vitally important that people remember to still see their GP if they suspect any sign or symptom of cancer so that they can be referred to a specialist if needed.
How has your work, and research into cancer more generally, been affected by the COVID-19 pandemic?
When the pandemic hit in 2020, we saw a rapid shut down across the world of nearly all our research projects due to university and research institute closures. There were some exceptions, such as in Israel, where our scientists were still able to go to the lab to conduct their research. But even then, they were working at a reduced capacity, with strict social distancing and safety measures in place to protect people.
One thing we felt was important was to make sure that our researchers did not feel pressured in the face of delays caused by lab closures. We offered all our researchers the chance to extend the length of their projects to make up for the lost time. We also allowed the researchers who were just about to start their projects, when the pandemic hit, to delay their start date.
We also had to react quickly internally to shift our annual Big Ideas Gathering, where our Scientific Advisory Committee makes the final decision on which new projects to fund, from a face-to-face meeting to a virtual one. This came with its own set of challenges, but the team did a fantastic job adjusting and we were delighted to be able to make a commitment to fund 16 new projects which will start in 2021.

Can you speculate as to the longer-term consequences of the pandemic for cancer research?
This is a difficult question to speculate an answer to, but we do know that charity-funded medical research is under threat all over the world. In the UK, the sector invested an estimated £1.9 billion in medical research in 2019, which is around half of all publicly funded medical research. The sector is now facing a 40% decrease in medical research spend over the next year and a shortfall of £310 million caused by the impact on fundraising. It’s expected that it will take four and a half years for the sector to recover – something that could have a devastating impact on people diagnosed with cancer in the future.
Despite the significant and unprecedented challenges, what positives have arisen for cancer research over the last year?
COVID-19 undoubtedly slowed scientific research all over the world in 2020, but science has not stopped completely. Scientists supported by Worldwide Cancer Research have contributed to several important breakthroughs in 2020 – including a new cancer vaccine that could enter clinical trials within the next three years and a game-changing treatment for prostate cancer that could be available to patients within four years.
We were also delighted that, thanks to the generosity of our supporters, we were still able to fund new projects this year. We invested over £3.2million in 16 new projects happening in 11 countries around the world. Knowing that we will continue to start new cancer cures gives us, our supporters and people affected by cancer, much-needed hope for the future.
‘…people with cancer are in danger of becoming collateral damage as a result of everyone’s attention being focussed on “the other C” – COVID-19.’

Finally, how can we ensure that cancer research remains a priority in such challenging times?
The type of research Worldwide Cancer Research funds is what we call discovery research. It’s the starting point from which new ways to prevent, diagnose and treat cancer emerge. Without it, we would not have the foundations to build on and we could miss out on future lifesaving discoveries. We must continue to fund this type of research to keep the ideas flowing down the pipeline – now is the time to invest in our future. As we have seen with the amazing response to COVID-19, research is essential to progress. And putting money behind research and those that fund it means that we can make progress faster.
People have woken up to the power of science and research to solve global problems. With 1 in 2 of us in the UK predicted to receive a cancer diagnosis during our lifetime, this is the time to use the momentum we have gained and use it to tackle the ‘big C’.

Reference
https://doi.org/10.33548/SCIENTIA651
Want to republish our articles?
We encourage all formats of sharing and republishing of our articles. Whether you want to host on your website, publication or blog, we welcome this. Find out more
Creative Commons Licence
(CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. 
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More articles you may like
Dr Rhett Martin | Governing Nature at the Edge of Collapse
For millions of men, ageing brings with it a set of frustrating and often disruptive urinary symptoms. These symptoms, caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH, can affect sleep, confidence, and overall quality of life. Traditionally, treatment follows a familiar path. Patients begin with medications, often for years, and may eventually progress to surgery if symptoms worsen. Yet this pathway is not without its drawbacks. Medications can cause side effects, while surgery carries risks and recovery time. In recent years, a minimally invasive interventional radiology procedure called prostate artery embolisation, or PAE, has begun to challenge this traditional model. At the forefront of this shift is a collaborative research group, led by Dr. Nicholas Brown of the University of Queensland, whose series of P-EASY studies has explored whether PAE could transform how BPH is treated, particularly at earlier stages.
Assoc Prof. Nicholas Brown | Rethinking Prostate Care: A New Frontier in Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
For millions of men, ageing brings with it a set of frustrating and often disruptive urinary symptoms. These symptoms, caused by benign prostatic hyperplasia, or BPH, can affect sleep, confidence, and overall quality of life. Traditionally, treatment follows a familiar path. Patients begin with medications, often for years, and may eventually progress to surgery if symptoms worsen. Yet this pathway is not without its drawbacks. Medications can cause side effects, while surgery carries risks and recovery time. In recent years, a minimally invasive interventional radiology procedure called prostate artery embolisation, or PAE, has begun to challenge this traditional model. At the forefront of this shift is a collaborative research group, led by Dr. Nicholas Brown of the University of Queensland, whose series of P-EASY studies has explored whether PAE could transform how BPH is treated, particularly at earlier stages.
Jean Lycke | Addressing Unmet Medical Needs in Mucosal Disease: A Close-to-Market Innovation Approach
Recurrent Aphthous Stomatitis (RAS) is an oral condition characterized by one or several painful mucosal ulcers. RAS affects a large proportion of the population and has a point prevalence of approximately 2–3%, daily. The etiology remains unknown, and there is currently no curative treatment. Most patients experience recurring episodes over time, with each episode typically lasting up to a week. Here, we describe the development of a mucoadhesive patch which, when applied over a RAS ulcer, provides rapid pain relief. The patch is easy for patients to apply when symptoms begin and has the potential to be used as an over-the-counter product. The development of the Mucocort mucoadhesive patch is an example of a Close-to-Market innovation strategy that embraces simplicity within a complex healthcare system. By simplifying the product concept, the team has reduced the number of regulatory steps required before market approval. This MedTech/Pharma innovation model, known as the “4R” framework – Re-purposing, Re-formulation, Re-positioning, and Re-patenting – has guided the program from concept to commercialization. In addition to the biodegradable mucoadhesive patch developed for RAS ulcers, the team is extending the innovation concept to a mucoadhesive gel formulation for the prevention and treatment of chemotherapy-induced mucositis. This gel-based program is being commercialized separately through MucoShield.
The Translational Asian Agerelated Macular Degeneration Program Phase 2 (TAAP-2): Reimagining the Future of Vision Care
Age-related macular degeneration, often abbreviated as AMD, is one of the leading causes of vision loss among older adults worldwide. In Asia, where populations are ageing rapidly, its impact is particularly profound. For many, the disease quietly erodes central vision, making everyday activities such as reading, driving, and recognising faces increasingly difficult. Against this backdrop, the Translational Asian Age-related Macular Degeneration Programme, or TAAP for short, has emerged as a bold and ambitious effort to confront the disease headon. Now in its second phase, TAAP-2 represents a significant evolution in both scientific scope and clinical ambition.



