Dr Nathalie Pettorelli – Rewilding: Bet on Nature
Opinion article by Dr Nathalie Pettorelli of ZSL (Zoological Society of London)
Climate & Biodiversity Crises
If there is one thing to celebrate about this year, it’s the fact that the country has finally started to wake up to the climate emergency. Thanks, among other things, to the thousands of children regularly striking for their right to have a better future than the one we have been building for them, a majority of the UK public, now back a 2030 zero-carbon target.
But the climate emergency has to be understood and tackled within the context of the current biodiversity crisis, which is equally severe and far-reaching. Climate is indeed the predominant driver of life on Earth, with climate and biodiversity being closely intertwined.
On one hand, biodiversity is being affected by the rapid changes we see in temperatures, precipitation, sea levels and the frequency and severity of extreme natural events, with some species being put at direct risk of extinction with climate change, and others having started to move out of their known distribution range (as we recently showed for the UK).
On the other hand, biodiversity loss, shaped by climate change but also by other factors such as habitat degradation and loss or overexploitation, can accelerate climate change. The loss of coastal ecosystems such as mangroves, sea grass and salt marshes, for example, reduces nature’s ability to help soak up carbon; forest loss and other land use changes account for a significant proportion of greenhouse gas emissions; wildlife loss can influence plant nutrient availability, which itself impacts, for example, how much carbon is released by forests.
Turning the Tide
As the planet’s life-support systems are fast approaching a danger zone for humanity, there is a need to be strategic about the changes we promote for adequately turning the tide on climate change. Geoengineering solutions, sometimes introduced as the magic wand likely to solve our climate change crisis without us needing to alter our ways of living, won’t stop us from losing wildlife at the unprecedented rates we are witnessing.
What we need is a shift in how we conceptualise our relationship with nature, as well as the adoption of a vision that not only promotes a different path for development underpinned by the sustainable use of natural resources, but that also acknowledges that our ability to tackle the current climate crisis is closely linked to our ability to retain and increase biodiversity.
Increasing biological diversity in a rapidly changing world is not easy however, and challenges old ways to think about biodiversity conservation. Until recently, conservation science has been busy researching how we can bring back degraded ecosystems to known ‘healthy’ baselines. However, the intensity and speed of global environmental changes have pressed many practitioners and scientists to realise that some species are being pushed far beyond their traditional ranges and some ecosystems far beyond their limits.
In many places on Earth, it now makes little sense to force the restoration of historical conditions, given the expected changes in environmental conditions in the coming years. In such situations, the facilitation of the emergence of novel ecosystems through rewilding may prove a more sensible and cost‐effective alternative to address declining biodiversity and the delivery of ecosystem services.
‘Well-planned rewilding projects could increase carbon capture and storage capabilities and help protect communities at risk of flooding.’
What rewilding could offer in the context of the current climate emergency is exciting. Well-planned rewilding projects could increase carbon capture and storage capabilities and help protect communities at risk of flooding. However, rewilding also breaks many traditions in conservation, which partly explains why it has proven so controversial.
First, it promotes the idea that the future isn’t about bringing back what we know where we want it, but about supporting the emergence of functioning and biodiverse ecosystems, in whatever forms they may come. It therefore acknowledges that human control on what the wild is, where it goes, and how it should look, has to be significantly reduced if we are to see global biodiversity increase again – a stark contrast to the old Victorian vision that nature needs to be managed, controlled, and dominated.
Second, by placing the emphasis on reduced control and increased unpredictability, it recognises the overwhelming importance of securing successful coexistence between humans and nature for effective conservation-based environmental management. This consequently leads to a change of focus, from ecosystems to socio-ecological systems, thereby leading to a repositioning of the conservation narratives, where humans are firmly part of nature, not separate and not above.
Third, it promotes a more dynamic approach to conservation, where changes and self-reorganisations are welcome, and the norm. Fourth, by being concerned with the level of functioning ecosystems exhibit rather than by their species composition, rewilding opens the door to species being introduced or welcomed in ecosystems outside of their historic distribution range – thereby firmly endorsing assisted colonisation as a conservation tool fit for the environmental management in the 21st century.
Ultimately, rewilding is only one of the nature-based solutions that aim to co-address the current climate and biodiversity crises. But it’s by far the most tantalising one, because it has the potential to drastically impact our relationship with nature.
Admittedly, there are uncertainties and difficulties associated with the practical implementation of rewilding projects, while the evidence available for facilitating sound decision‐making for rewilding initiatives is growing but remains scarce. Moreover, rewilding means different things to different people, having been interpreted by some as a way to promote the conservation of human-free landscapes, leading to conflicts between various fractions of society.
That said, as divisive as the topic may be and as tense as the current debate may appear, whoever is concerned with environmental management can simply not afford to ignore discussions on rewilding and miss potential opportunities to build a better future for the generations to come.
To make rewilding a widely implemented and efficient nature-based solution to address climate change, we need a science-based foundation that is able to inform policy and management: generating this foundation will require dialogue and expertise from all sectors of society. This is why I hope that, if you haven’t yet engaged with these discussions, you’ll soon do.
MEET THE AUTHOR
Dr Nathalie Pettorelli is a Senior Research Fellow at ZSL’s (Zoological Society of London) Institute of Zoology. A climate change and rewilding expert, her scientific achievements include demonstrating how satellite data can be used to support vulnerability assessments of species and ecosystems to climate change, to pioneering social media as a source of data for species on the move due to climate change. Dr Pettorelli has recently edited a book on rewilding, which provides an inclusive and representative overview of where current thinking on this topic sits.
Creative Commons Licence
(CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More articles you may like
Calgranulins are relatively small proteins, usually around 100 amino acids long. Calprotectin is a complex of two of these small proteins, S100A8 and S100A9, getting its name from its protective, antimicrobial properties. Dr Mark Herzberg at the University of Minnesota, USA, has extensively researched the antimicrobial action of this protein complex, and this knowledge is now leading serendipitously to the development of potential therapeutic agents for certain types of human cancer.
Agricultural weeds have the potential to cause significant crop loss. As such, conventional weed management practices have aimed to keep crop fields free from weeds through the broad application of herbicides. However, these practices have damaging consequences on the surrounding environment. Dr Rakesh Chandran and his team in the Agriculture and Natural Resources Department of West Virginia University have developed a more sustainable herbicide application regime that allows weeds to coexist with corn crops at acceptable levels, with the aim of improving environmental health without significantly sacrificing crop yield.
Neurodegenerative disorders present a major cause of death and disability worldwide. Treatments are typically expensive, non-efficient, and invasive. Although scientists are committed to finding better treatment strategies, the challenge of penetrating the blood-brain barrier remains. This highly selective envelope protects our brain from harmful substances but also prevents drugs from reaching the brain when needed. Dr Shikha Nangia at Syracuse University, USA, focuses on understanding the molecular structure of this complex interface to ultimately facilitate the transport of drugs across the blood-brain barrier.
The alarming decline of pollinating insects in recent years has garnered a wave of interest from the media, scientists and the public. This has resulted in a wealth of research into pollinator conservation, but despite this, adoption of beneficial practices that support pollinators has been low amongst private landholders. Dr Shannon Westlake and Dr Kevin Hunt of Mississippi State University have been investigating the human elements behind pollinator conservation, with the aim of developing targeted outreach and support programs to improve the uptake of conservation efforts amongst landholders.