Dr Peter Evans – Retro-Causality: Unravelling the Mysteries of Quantum Cosmology
Despite many years of research aiming to unite quantum mechanics with cosmological theories, researchers in fields across physics and philosophy remain in disagreement about a solution. Now, Dr Peter Evans at the University of Queensland sheds new light on the debate. He argues that on quantum scales, the idea of cause and effect does not need to follow the one-way passage of time, as we understand it. If correct, his theories could dispel some of the most puzzling mysteries of quantum theory – a significant step forward in understanding the true nature of the universe.
For decades, scientists and philosophers alike have struggled to reconcile our current understanding of the nature of the universe with the theory of quantum mechanics. This broad field, known as ‘quantum cosmology’, encompasses a wide variety of efforts to unite quantum behaviours, which unfold on the very smallest of scales, with processes such as the universe’s accelerating expansion.
Such a goal is a mammoth undertaking. Despite the fact that our current theories of quantum mechanics and cosmology each work well on their own, they still appear to be completely incompatible with each other. So far, no one has come close to merging them into a single theory.
Dr Peter Evans at the University of Queensland considers a different angle to the problem: what if events that happened in the past could have been caused by events in their futures? The idea is clearly incompatible with our current idea of spacetime, in which time progresses in one direction. However, Dr Evans argues that given a conceptual framework built from the right background assumptions, his ideas could answer some of the most pressing questions posed by quantum cosmology. To justify these claims, he has drawn together a variety of concepts first devised in previous studies, in fields including cosmology, quantum mechanics and philosophy.
Redefining the Cause and Effect Chain
Philosophers have incorporated the idea of cause and effect into their arguments for many centuries – many of them using it to justify their beliefs about the origins of the universe. The concept describes how an event cannot happen unless it has been triggered by another event, which happened in its past. Today, the concept of cause and effect continues to be important in quantum mechanics, where it has been given the name ‘causality’. In this context, the idea demands that even on quantum scales, one event must always have been caused by another.
Contrary to well-established philosophical theories, Dr Evans argues that in quantum mechanics, chains of events do not necessarily need to play out within our limited, one-directional view of the flow of time. Where conventional physics experiments ultimately rely on this more conventional concept, his work is based on the possibility of backwards-in-time, or ‘retro’-causality, where quantum mechanics allows for the occurrence of an event that has been triggered by another event occurring in its future (from our perspective).
Many researchers continue to discredit retro-causality as a flawed idea, since many scientific theories are fundamentally based around the idea that time is one-directional, and cannot flow backwards. If retro-causality did turn out to be true, they would argue that many of the fundamental laws of the universe as we currently understand it would need to be completely re-written. However, Dr Evans has set out to prove that retro-causal influences are not only possible, but could also provide a variety of meaningful solutions to the challenges faced by researchers of quantum cosmology.
Considering Retro-Causal Influences
One of the biggest puzzles currently faced by quantum theorists is the undeniable observation of ‘action at a distance’ interactions, where certain events must have been triggered by others happening simultaneously. As Einstein clearly showed, this shouldn’t be allowed to happen, since the universe has a fundamental speed limit – the speed of light – which must mean that an event can’t happen at the same time as the event it has been caused by.
In addition, quantum theory appears to suggest that objects on quantum scales can only be ‘real’ when they are observed; otherwise, they only exist as a cloud of potential positions in space and time. Many theorists argue that this blurry idea of reality can’t really represent what is actually happening, and that it is simply unscientific to say that an object doesn’t exist simply because it isn’t being measured.
As Dr Evans explains, these types of long-standing problems could be solved if quantum mechanics allowed the chain of cause and effect, which underlies the behaviour of the universe, to be not restricted to a one-way flow of time. ‘My research considers the possibility of retro-causal influences playing a role in solving some of the mysteries of quantum theory,’ he says. ‘Some of these quantum peculiarities, such as apparent action at a distance or the definite reality of the quantum system between measurements, obtain a natural and intuitive interpretation when considered as arising as a result of retro-causal influences at the quantum scale.’ Dr Evans believes that if certain perhaps unorthodox background assumptions are made when stating the nature of the universe, there is nothing to say that retro-causality isn’t possible.
‘My research considers the possibility of retro-causal influences playing a role in solving some of the mysteries of quantum theory’
Conceptual Framework for Retro-Causality
The first of these unorthodox background assumptions is called the ‘block universe’ model, which states that the universe exists as an unchanging four-dimensional block. Four-dimensional spacetime is a widely used concept amongst cosmologists, describing how the three-dimensional space in which we exist is continually changed by the fourth dimension, which we know as time. Recently, some theorists have argued that if the universe exists as an unchanging four-dimensional block, time must not be some irreversible concept; rather, everything that will ever happen is essentially happening simultaneously. Within this framework, retro-causal influences may be allowed to occur from our perspective.
The second assumption is named the ‘interventionalist account of causation’, which describes how certain events can be caused by other events, but only if the variable responsible for the first event was changed in a certain way. This is in contrast to the conventional idea that all events must have been triggered by past events to which they are linked, no matter the nature of the variable change that gave rise to the first event. If connections between events really are more exclusive, retro-causal influences could in fact become a necessary property of the nature of the universe.
To adopt each of these ideas, Dr Evans argues that we would need to let go of our current view of the past as something we can know everything about. Instead, he says, we should adopt a more flexible idea of time. If these background assumptions are made, he believes that retro-causality can be seen as a feasible solution to many of the problems posed by quantum cosmology. ‘The notion of retro-causality cannot be ruled out on analytic grounds, and so comprises a viable conceptual framework for attempting to understand quantum phenomena,’ he explains.
Having established this groundwork, Dr Evans then aimed to describe the conditions in which retro-causal events would occur. He has concluded that in order for his ideas to work, a highly unorthodox piece of philosophy is needed: we would need to view causality as an ‘agent-relative’ idea.
In this context, an ‘agent’ is a causal actor in the world, which we certainly take humans to be. We would probably take certain advanced robots, and perhaps even intelligent extra-terrestrial lifeforms, to be agents also. Viewing causality as an ‘agent-relative’ notion is counterpoised to the idea that causality is an objective feature of the world – out there independently of the causal players in the world, and existing even if there were no humans. Agent-relative causality implies that there is some key ingredient to the way that agents interact with the world that is integral to what we think causality is fundamentally.
By extending this notion to quantum causality, Dr Evans claims that some of the mysterious behaviours of quantum systems would begin to look like a symptom of the agent-relative nature of causality, and not as some ad hoc injection of the role of the agent in quantum mechanics, as one finds in the measurement problem.
‘Causality can be understood as an agent-relative notion, thereby highlighting the fact that the agent is able to play a significant part in the interpretation of quantum theory, without the postulation of any extra agent-centric phenomena,’ Dr Evans describes. ‘That is, we don’t need to specify any special new rules that agents interacting with quantum systems need to obey; it’s the fundamental causal rules that agents necessarily obey that bring about the peculiar quantum behaviour.’
If this idea is correct, the task of researchers studying the nature of causality would become far easier. Ultimately, it could break down the mystery of processes including action at a distance, and the reality of quantum objects when they are not being observed.
A New Take on Quantum Cosmology
Quantum cosmology has now become one of the most hotly debated fields among both physicists and philosophers, with very little agreement being reached amongst researchers over the very nature of our reality. In this stagnant academic environment, the approach taken by Dr Evans could prove to move the discussion along from its current deadlock – dispelling the idea that quantum observations are not consistent with our current understanding of causality.
Ultimately, this could allow for important new insights into the nature of the universe, bringing researchers one crucial step closer to reconciling quantum mechanics with the most fundamental theories of cosmology.
Meet the researcher
Dr Peter Evans
School of Historical and Philosophical Inquiry
University of Queensland
Dr Peter Evans was awarded his PhD from the University of Sydney in 2011, for a thesis entitled A Study of Time in Modern Physics. After graduating, Dr Evans joined the University of Queensland in 2014, where he now works as a Discovery Early Career Research Fellow of the Australian Research Council (ARC), pursuing the long-term task of ‘a philosophical exploration of simulating and controlling the quantum world’. His main research interests include philosophy of physics and science, quantum foundations, and metaphysics. He has already achieved several prestigious awards to pursue his work, including the ARC Discovery Early Career Researcher Award, which he received in 2017.
Australian Research Council (ARC)
PW Evans, Quantum Causal Models, Faithfulness, and Retrocausality, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 2018, 69, 745–774.
PW Evans, S Gryb, KP Thébault, Ψ-epistemic quantum cosmology?, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 2016, 56, 1–12.
PW Evans, Retrocausality at no extra cost, Synthese, 2015, 192, 1139–1155.
Creative Commons Licence
(CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More articles you may like
With ongoing climate change, land use change, and changing disturbance regimes that negatively impact Earth’s ecosystems, it is critical that educators convey the importance of safeguarding the natural environment to younger generations to prepare them to face current and future environmental challenges. Teaching Change comprises a collection of innovative programs aimed at strengthening the relationship between youth and nature in Hawaiʻi while also inspiring Hawaii’s youth to become the next generation of natural resource scientists and managers. Teaching Change addresses this mission through immersive, place-based, outdoor Field Courses for local students, and Teacher Training Workshops for local teachers.
We know much about fully-formed stars, such as our Sun, but the very earliest processes of star formation are still a mysterious area of astrophysical research. The original idea that a single new-born star (or ‘protostar’) forms within a single molecular cloud core has been dispelled by the discovery of new-born pairs, triplets, or even larger groups of protostars in cores. Dr Philip Myers of the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard and Smithsonian has been observing and interpreting protostar formation for many years using a range of sophisticated telescopes and theoretical models.
Dr Shadia Habbal | Dr Miloslav Druckmüller – Hiding the Sun: Coronal Discoveries during Total Solar Eclipses
Extending far beyond its surface, the Sun’s corona hosts a variety of intricate structures and behaviours. Yet because the Sun is so much brighter than its surrounding environment, these properties can be incredibly hard to spot under typical observing conditions. In their research, Dr Shadia Habbal at the University of Hawaii and Dr Miloslav Druckmüller at Brno University make use of one of the most well-known astronomical phenomena to solve this issue: total solar eclipses.
Professor Matthias Weigelt – The Psychology and Ethics of Maximising Performance in Competitive Sports
In sporting performance, developing a competitive edge over opponents is essential. Professor Matthias Weigelt at the University of Paderborn, Germany, specialises in the application of psychological theory and methods to the understanding and enhancement of athletic performance. Read on to discover how by taking a cognitive neuroscientific approach to understanding deceptive actions in sports, Professor Weigelt is unravelling the processes underlying expertise in responding to head fakes in basketball with critical ethical implications.