Professor Kirk Erickson – Health Neuroscience: How and Why Exercise Improves Cognitive
We all know exercise is good for us. In addition to the renowned physical benefits, Professor Kirk Erickson in the Department of Psychology at the University of Pittsburgh is providing powerful evidence that exercise may improve cognitive faculties throughout the lifespan. Read on to discover the wide range of ways in which exercise can help us to live our lives to the fullest across the years, and how the emerging field of health neuroscience may inform public health policy for our better good.
Sedentary Lifestyles in the Digital Era
Exercise is crucially important for our physical health yet, despite this, many of us do not achieve the recommended levels of physical activity. A major cause of this is the impact of the digital era in encouraging us to lead increasingly sedentary lifestyles. From sitting behind our computers for work to driving or taking public transport from A to B, for many of us, there is little physical exertion in our day to day lives compared to that of our prior generations.
This is of particular concern due to the long-established link between lack of exercise and the development of chronic diseases, including obesity, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, all of which are on the rise at a global level at an alarming rate.
In addition to the detrimental impact of lack of exercise on our physical health, increasing evidence obtained over the last 20 years suggests that our brain and cognitive faculties (such as memory and attention) are also negatively affected. However, when we do exercise, the benefits can be significant. Professor Kirk Erickson in the Department of Psychology at the University of Pittsburgh, USA, is a pioneer in elucidating the beneficial impacts of exercise on brain structure, function, and cognition in the emerging field of health neuroscience.
Neuroprotective Effect of Exercise in Old Age
The hippocampus is a small neural structure in the brain, implicated in both learning and memory. As we age, physical deterioration to the hippocampus in the form of shrinkage is both a precursor to and cause of impairments to memory. In older adulthood, increasing difficulties with memory are often considered part of the normal aging process, as well as a hallmark symptom of neurological disease (such as Alzheimer’s disease and other forms of dementia) when the impairments are substantially more severe.
Professor Erickson and colleagues noted in a paper published in 2011 that existing research indirectly suggested that exercise may increase the size of the hippocampus in the brain in older adults but that this suggestion had not yet been confirmed or quantified. To address this, they conducted a randomised controlled trial in which they recruited 120 older adults without dementia, and allocated participants to one of two groups: an aerobic exercise group or a control group who completed only stretching exercises.
The findings were astonishing – aerobic exercise training increased hippocampal volume by 2%, which the researchers explained effectively reversed age-related loss in hippocampal volume by 1 to 2 years compared to the control group. Furthermore, this was associated with demonstrable benefits to spatial memory, a specific type of memory related to information about our environment and location (how to find our way to the local shops, for example). These findings provided the first direct evidence that aerobic exercise has a neuroprotective effect on critical cognitive functions in aging. In other words, undertaking such exercise can reduce or, to an extent, ameliorate ‘normal’ age-related cognitive decline.
‘The results from this trial could transform scientific-based policy and health care recommendations for approaches to improve cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults.’
Exercise as an Effective Intervention Post-stroke
Professor Erickson and his team then turned their attention to the effects of exercise in either preserving or potentially even improving cognition following stroke. For survivors of stroke, cognitive impairment presents significant challenges through being associated with further deterioration in health, lowering of quality of life, and decreased independence in daily life skills and self-care.
Using a statistical technique known as a meta-analysis, Professor Erickson and colleagues evaluated the combined findings from 14 separate randomised controlled trials (constituting a total of 736 participants) that had tested the effects of exercise on various measures of cognitive function. Conducting a meta-analysis allows a more powerful and reliable estimation of the effects of a given intervention than can be derived from a single study alone.
Professor Erickson found that benefits to cognition were most pronounced for combined aerobic and strength training programs (as compared to either activity being completed in isolation). Benefits were found even in the chronic post-stroke phase (which in this study was on average around 2.5 years), suggesting that exercise as an intervention can be effectively utilised even some time after the stroke itself.
Benefits of Exercise in Children
To date, the majority of research has focused on the benefits of exercise in older adulthood. However, there is converging evidence that childhood is a key stage of development in which physical activity may also provide tangible benefits. In a review paper published in 2017, Professor Erickson and colleagues synthesised the available literature on the effects of exercise in childhood.
Here, the researchers noted that greater integrity of grey matter in the brain, a critical structure associated with a wide range of functions including muscle control, sensory perception, and higher-level functions (such as memory), is associated with greater levels of physical fitness in children and adults alike. The researchers also noted that levels of physical activity can be directly linked to measures of academic success in school children. Such findings are, of course, of keen interest to educationalists, parents, as well as society more broadly, given the profound implications of being able to increase academic attainment in our younger generations.
Taking a reasoned approach, Professor Erickson and colleagues pointed to limitations in the existing research and highlighted avenues for future research. First, they argued for the need for causal rather than merely correlational evidence to elucidate the underlying mechanisms of benefit for exercise in children. Second, they suggested that the circumstances that confer the greatest benefits for exercise on cognition, such as the age of child, duration, frequency, and intensity of exercise, should be identified as a priority.
The Emergence of Health Neuroscience: From Theory to Public Health
The approach adopted by Professor Erickson and colleagues in understanding how the brain affects and is affected by health behaviours such as exercise is known as health neuroscience. This is a new and interdisciplinary field of work, offering both great potential but also, as with any new approach in science, challenges to be overcome in maximising its potential application.
Professor Erickson and colleagues argue that it is not sufficient to merely describe the relationships between our physical health, brain function, and cognition, but rather, that the overarching aim of health neuroscience should be to use empirical findings and the associated theoretical perspectives for the better good, in this case, to improve public health.
As part of work for the USA Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee in 2018, Professor Erickson and colleagues summarised the evidence suggesting that exercise has beneficial effects on both the brain and cognition, and concluded that this is likely to be the case across the lifespan and for different clinical groups. Although they acknowledged that important gaps in the evidence remain, the consistency and magnitude of evidence supporting the beneficial effects were deemed as ‘truly remarkable’ with the potential to inform the development of public health policies aiming to improve cognitive health across the lifespan.
Striding Forward: Investigating Gains in Neurocognition in an Intervention Trial of Exercise (IGNITE)
Professor Erickson is committed to progressing this important field of health neuroscience. To this end, he is currently working on the large-scale Investigating Gains in Neurocognition in an Intervention Trial of Exercise (called IGNITE), which is planned to run until the end of 2022. Almost 700 cognitively healthy adults aged between 65–80 years of age are being assigned to one of the following exercise conditions each lasting one year in duration: moderate-intensity aerobic exercise condition (150 minutes per week), moderate-intensity aerobic exercise condition (225 minutes per week), or light-intensity stretching and toning control condition (150 minutes per week).
Participants are undertaking an extensive battery of assessments as outcome measures, including measures of cognition, blood biomarkers, and psychosocial questionnaires at several timepoints. In addition, brain magnetic resonance imaging, physiological biomarkers, cardiorespiratory fitness, physical function, and positron emission tomography are also being utilised as assessments, representing an ambitious yet methodologically robust and comprehensive clinical trial.
On completion, this landmark study will allow the researchers to address key questions about exercise and cognition; most notably, whether the current USA guidelines of 150 minutes of exercise per week are sufficient to elicit benefits to cognition in older adults. Findings will also begin to address the issue of the potential dose-response relationship between exercise and brain and cognitive outcomes. To put it more simply, findings will help determine whether more exercise equates to better cognitive function. As Professor Erickson notes, ‘The results from this trial could transform scientific-based policy and health care recommendations for approaches to improve cognitive function in cognitively normal older adults.’
By using exercise as a model within the new field of health neuroscience, Professor Erickson is aptly demonstrating how rigorous experimental and theoretical approaches can help address the monumental need to improve human health and cognition across the lifespan in our current age.
Meet the researcher
Professor Kirk I Erickson
Department of Psychology
Center for the Neural Basis of Cognition
University of Pittsburgh
Professor Kirk Erickson completed his PhD at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign in 2005 and then undertook a three-year postdoctoral position at the same institution. In 2008, he moved to the University of Pittsburgh to take up an assistant professorship and rapidly rose through the ranks to be promoted to his current position of professor in 2017. Professor Erickson is widely acclaimed as a scientist, having most recently been appointed as a Distinguished Scientist at Murdoch University (2019–2020) and as a Fellow at the Academy of Behavioral Medicine Research from 2016. From 2016–2018, Professor Erickson was appointed to the Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee by the United States Secretary of Health and Human Services, reflecting his significant contribution to healthcare policy and societal issues. Professor Erickson is an active editor and reviewer for a number of prestigious journals, and has published a total of more than 200 journal articles and book chapters. An impressive track record of funding continues to support Professor Erickson’s research into brain changes in late adulthood and the factors that promote successful aging.
Arthur Kramer – Northeastern University
Charles Hillman – Northeastern University
Jeffrey Burns – University of Kansas Medical Center
Edward McAuley – University of Illinois
Eric Vidoni – University of Kansas Medical Center
Michelle Voss – University of Iowa
Chelsea Stillman – University of Pittsburgh
Catherine Bender – University of Pittsburgh
John Jakicic – University of Pittsburgh
Chaeryon Kang – University of Pittsburgh
Peter Gianaros – University of Pittsburgh
National Institutes of Health
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Australian Research Council
KI Erickson, C Hillman, CM Stillman, et al, Physical activity and cognition: A review of the 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines, 2019, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 51, 1242–51.
CM Stillman, K Erickson, Physical activity as a model for health neuroscience, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 2018, 1428, 103–111.
CH Hillman, KI Erickson, BD Hatfield, Run for your life! Childhood physical activity effects on brain and cognition, Kinesiology Review, 2017, 6, 12–21.
LE Oberlin, A Waiwood, T Cumming, et al, Effects of physical activity on post-stroke cognitive function: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, Stroke, 2017, 48, 3093–3100.
KI Erickson, MW Voss, RS Prakash, et al, Exercise training increases size of hippocampus and improves memory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2011, 108, 3017–3022.
Creative Commons Licence
(CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More articles you may like
Dr Jennifer Kay | Professor Bevin Page Engelward – The MIT Superfund Research Program: Studies on Cleaning Up Genes and the Environment
In the United States, there are thousands of industrial sites contaminated by the irresponsible disposal of chemical waste. The higher than expected frequency of cancer cases near these sites has caused alarm, since many of the chemical contaminants found at these sites have been linked to the development of long-term health problems, including cancer. As leaders of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Superfund Research Program, Dr Jennifer Kay (Research Scientist and Research Translation Director) and Professor Bevin Page Engelward (Program Director) are using their expertise to investigate the genetic factors that influence susceptibility to adverse health outcomes following exposure to environmental chemicals.
Professor Steven E. Wilson – Clearing the Haze: Understanding the Process of Scarring Following Corneal Injury
Any injury such as trauma, surgery or infection to the cornea in the eye may result in persistent scarring (clinically referred to as fibrosis) due to the wound healing response. Professor Steven E. Wilson at the Cole Eye Institute of the Cleveland Clinic Foundation has identified that defective epithelial basement membrane (EBM) regeneration plays a central role in the development of scar producing myofibroblast cells. Critically, Professor Wilson suggests that the pathophysiological consequences of defective EBM regeneration are also likely to have wider relevance to the fibrosis that occurs in other organs, such as the lungs, heart, kidneys, and skin.
Dr Jun Hua, Associate Professor at the F. M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging at the Kennedy Krieger Institute and Johns Hopkins University, USA, leads a team focused on developing novel magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technologies for imaging the structure and function of the brain. Recently, they have been pioneering the development of new MRI techniques that can be used to improve pre-surgical planning for neurological patients and optimise patient outcomes.
Professor Stephan Pleschka | Professor M Lienhard Schmitz – The Influenza A Genotype and Cell Signalling Networks
Influenza viruses pose a major threat despite advances in vaccine and drug development. Research into the cellular and molecular mechanisms that drive influenza viruses aims to reveal new drug targets to fight disease. However, information on the molecular mechanisms of how influenza viruses infect and replicate in host cells is currently limited. As part of the German Collaborative Research Centre 1021 (CRC1021), Professors Stephan Pleschka and M Lienhard Schmitz at the Justus Liebig University Giessen in Germany are exploring the impact of the genetic variability of influenza viruses on the interactions between the virus and host cell that regulate viral infection and replication.