Dr Beate Aurich | Identifying, Understanding and Managing Treatment-related Risks of Medicines Prescribed to Children
The relatively new field of paediatric pharmacovigilance aims to improve the clinical care of children by understanding and appropriately managing the risks of medicines administered to this group of patients. Dr Beate Aurich is an established expert in this field, and with colleagues, has published an article on the practical aspects of paediatric pharmacovigilance. She notes that the assessment of the benefit-risk balance of available treatment options should be based on multidisciplinary efforts and include both children and their families.
The Importance of Paediatric Pharmacovigilance
Research into the risks of medicines is called pharmacovigilance. It helps to identify, understand and reduce treatment-related risks – so-called adverse drug reactions or ADRs. Pharmacovigilance is a relatively young speciality that began to emerge in the 1930s following several major drug safety disasters.
Pharmacovigilance is a continuous process of monitoring treatment-related risks throughout the life cycle of medicinal products worldwide. It starts at the time of pre-clinical studies, i.e., before a new product is administered for the first time in humans. It is continued as long as there are still patients taking the medicine. To better understand certain long-term risks, pharmacovigilance may even be continued after a drug has been taken off the market.
Paediatric pharmacovigilance combines the understanding of general pharmacovigilance with the special requirements of children and how ADRs may affect the growing body. The overall aim is to help parents, children and healthcare professionals to make evidence-based treatment decisions by informing them about the possible risks of medicines and how these can be managed.
Dr Beate Aurich is a pharmacovigilance and drug safety consultant with extensive experience. One of her peer-reviewed publications, ‘c4c: Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper’, was written in collaboration with colleagues from the conect4children (c4c) network. This white paper describes some of the points to consider with regards to the detection and proactive management of treatment-related risks in paediatric studies and paediatric clinical practice.
‘the inclusion of children and their families for the effective management of treatment-related risks should be standard practice for paediatric pharmacovigilance and risk management activities.’
Identifying Treatment-related Risks in Children
Treatment-related risks in children are often different compared to adults. They can also vary between different paediatric age groups, for example, babies and adolescents. These differences can be due to factors such as age-related changes in the body’s metabolism, comorbidities (additional illnesses) and comedications (additional medicines). A further challenge is a higher risk of medication errors because formulations are frequently not adapted to children’s needs. Medicines administered to children may need to be prepared from drugs intended for adults, for example, by crushing a tablet and this can be a source of errors. The identification of treatment-related risks in children is based on the age-group-specific safety specification.
The safety specification summarises the scientific evidence for known and potential treatment-related risks and which safety data is currently missing. The analysis of existing data may include, for example, safety data from pre-clinical studies, modelling and simulation, pharmacology, interventional and non-interventional studies, registries, safety and electronic health care databases and the literature (e.g., drug class effects, information from health authorities). The safety data is then combined with the specifics of children including, for example, paediatric pharmacology, how ADRs present clinically in children, the risk for medication errors, possible interactions with the child’s nutrition and other medicines, and the challenges of collecting and analysing safety data in children.
Managing Treatment-related Risks in Children
The risk management of medicines administered to children has similarities to risk management in other domains of our daily life. For example, car seat-belt systems are adapted to the age and size of a child. This is based on data from real and simulated accidents and the understanding of the effects of the laws of physics on a child’s body. However, many medicines prescribed to children have very limited child-specific information on treatment-related risks. The management of treatment-related risks uses standard and additional risk management tools. The product’s package insert (label) is used for standard risk management. However, this is often difficult to understand, even for adults, and frequently not adapted to the needs of children. Informing children and parents about any important updates, in particular for medicines which are taken regularly, is a challenge. Additional risk management strategies may, for example, include informed assent/consent by the prescribing doctor or targeted testing for certain ADRs (e.g., liver function, genetic risk factors).
The Importance of Patient involvement
Paediatric pharmacovigilance and risk management require a multidisciplinary effort. Dr Aurich proposes that ‘the inclusion of children and their families for the effective management of treatment-related risks should be standard practice for paediatric pharmacovigilance and risk management activities’.
LISTEN TO THE AUDIO
MEET THE RESEARCHER
Dr Beate Aurich
Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety Consultant
Dr Beate Aurich obtained her medical degree in 1996 from Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. In 2001, she obtained the Membership of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (MRCPCH), London, UK. Between 2002 and 2006, she worked at the Drug Safety Research Unit in Southampton, UK, as a Medical Research Fellow. She obtained a medical doctorate in pharmacoepidemiology at Portsmouth University (UK) in 2006. From 2006 to 2015, she was the Director of Global Pharmacovigilance and Drug Safety at GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis, leading the Global Pharmacovigilance Team for marketed drugs and drugs in clinical development. Between 2015 and 2021, she worked as a Project Leader in the Department of Paediatric Clinical Pharmacology at Robert Debré Hospital in Paris, France.
She has over 20 years of experience in pharmacovigilance, pharmacoepidemiology and risk management in academic research and the pharmaceutical industry. This includes the detection and assessment of safety signals, risk minimisation, safety profiling, the review of individual case safety reports and aggregate safety data and writing risk management plans. She is also experienced in reviewing protocols, informed consent forms and paediatric investigation plans, planning safety data analyses, advising on the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) coding and contributing to regulatory documents (e.g., clinical safety summaries, study reports, development safety update reports, periodic safety update reports).
Since February 2020, she is a member of the conect4children (c4c) Expert Group for Paediatric Pharmacovigilance, writing articles on paediatric pharmacovigilance, teaching paediatric pharmacovigilance and drug safety and advising CDISC on the particularities of capturing clinical trial data in children. Dr Aurich is currently working as a pharmacovigilance and drug safety consultant in adult and paediatric research.
B Aurich, D Apele-Freimane, T Banaschewski, et al., C4C – Paediatric pharmacovigilance: Methodological considerations in research and development of medicines for children – A c4c expert group white paper, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2021, 1-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15119
B Aurich, E Vermeulen, V Elie, et al., Informed consent for neonatal trials: practical points to consider and a check list, BMJ Paediatrics Open, 2020, 4(1), e000847. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000847
B Aurich, T Martin-Montoya, D Zhang, E Jacqz-Aigrain, Reporting of offspring data in diabetes, HIV infection and hypertension trials during pregnancy: a systematic review, Archives of Disease in Childhood – Fetal and Neonatal Edition, 2020, 105(2), 215–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2019-316982
REPUBLISH OUR ARTICLES
We encourage all formats of sharing and republishing of our articles. Whether you want to host on your website, publication or blog, we welcome this. Find out more
Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
MORE ARTICLES YOU MAY LIKE
Adipose tissue is more commonly known as body fat. Unlike white adipose tissue, which is linked to negative cardiovascular outcomes such as metabolic syndrome, brown adipose tissue is positively related to health and may reduce the risk of cardiometabolic diseases. Professor Aaron Brown and his team at the MaineHealth Institute for Research are working to understand brown adipose tissue regulation and explore its therapeutic potential. They have already made significant advancements through the application of optogenetics, a cutting-edge technique that harnesses the power of light to precisely manipulate specific cellular processes.
Who gets to be a theorist? What kinds of theoretical work get marginalised in academic research? And how does this oppression play out in the peer-review process? Dr Kimberly Kay Hoang is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago. She has explored how difficult it is to get your sociology research published if you are not using research deemed to be legitimate by reviewers. She brings awareness to these issues and argues for change amongst scholars so that new forms of knowledge are not missed, especially regarding feminist, minority and racial theories.
The anonymous leak of the Panama Papers in 2016 revealed how the exceptionally wealthy (such as politicians, celebrities and business leaders) hide their money and exploit secretive offshore tax regimes. Dr Kimberly Kay Hoang is a Professor of Sociology at the University of Chicago, and after six years of research, hundreds of interviews and travelling 350,000 miles, she published Spiderweb Capitalism: How Global Elites Exploit Frontier Markets. She uncovered the mechanisms behind the movement of money into and out of Southeast Asia, and how that money travels all over the world.
Patents, or holding the intellectual property rights to an invention, can be of great importance to a company, as they allow them to sell their product in a specific market with reduced competition. Dr Ian Maxwell has recently considered the patents filed by Chinese entities in Australia, looking in particular at the recent growth in the number of these patents being filed. He considers the interplay between patents and political rulings and provides several insightful statistics about these Chinese-owned Australian patents.