Neuroscience Ireland (NI) was established in 2005 as Ireland’s National Neuroscience Society, and is a registered charity in the Republic of Ireland. NI has a membership in the region of 200 scientists and clinicians, and represents Ireland on the Governing Council of the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies. In this exclusive interview, we speak with Professor Áine Kelly, President of NI, to hear about their vital work driving forward excellence in neuroscience in Ireland and internationally.
To begin, please tell us how Neuroscience Ireland (NI) was established.
Historically, neuroscientists based in Ireland had formed various groups and networks, and organised neuroscience-focussed scientific meetings, but by the early 2000s, it was obvious that to make progress, Ireland needed a single cohesive neuroscience society that was formally constituted. It was also recognised that this society should be affiliated with the Federation of European Neuroscience Societies (FENS). Hence representatives from all major universities in Ireland came together to form the first Council of Neuroscience Ireland (NI), which is celebrating its 15th year as a registered charity and as a FENS member society. Even though we are a young society, we are building on a long history of Irish contributions to brain science that are perhaps not as well-recognised or celebrated as they should be. Neuroscience Ireland aims to remedy that through an ongoing project run by our former President Dr Richard Roche of NUI Maynooth, the Virtual Museum of Irish Brain Science.
What is the overarching vision at NI? As President, what are your aims for the future?
Our stated mission is to advance research and education in the neurosciences in Ireland, and to represent Irish neuroscience researchers both nationally and internationally. That’s quite a wide remit but because of our active membership, we are making continuous progress. Despite chronic underinvestment in neuroscience research, Irish researchers are consistently publishing world-class work in top-tier journals. That’s a message that we really want to get out there – not just to showcase what we are already doing, but to signal what we could achieve given the appropriate financial supports.
As President, my main aims for the future are focussed on building networks and relationships nationally and internationally. At home, Neuroscience Ireland is a key element of the neuroscience network in Ireland, through membership of the Irish Brain Council and association with the Neurological Alliance of Ireland and other charities and patient advocacy groups. We also organise a variety of public engagement activities to highlight the important contribution neuroscientists can make to the health and wellbeing of the Irish people.
Neuroscience Ireland is an all-island society that represents members north and south of the border. Recently, we have been delighted to welcome new members from the University of Ulster and Queens University Belfast to our Council and we are hoping to increase and strengthen those north-south links and expand our membership across the island. Our next ‘Young Neuroscience Symposium’, a biennial scientific meeting focussed on early career researchers, is being organised by our colleagues based in Northern Ireland and will be held in November. Due to COVID-19, it will be a virtual event but the society hopes to host one of our in-person scientific meetings in Northern Ireland at some time in the future.
Ireland is a small country but we make disproportionately large contributions to science, as in many areas, due to our ability to build strong and lasting working relationships. Just as Ireland sees its future within Europe, Neuroscience Ireland sees membership of FENS as key to its future success. Two Irish members, myself and former President Dr Eilís Dowd of NUI Galway, currently sit on the Governing Council, and we have three members on the FENS’ standing committees. Having a voice at the European level is especially important as we continue to advocate for that important increased investment. We also have a particularly strong relationship with another FENS member society – the British Neuroscience Association (BNA) – with whom we have co-hosted scientific meetings. We want to see this relationship continue to flourish, notwithstanding the complex political and economic climate resulting from Brexit.
Overall, I want to grow the society and to engender within the membership a sense of belonging to a society that represents Ireland’s neuroscience community in all its geographic and disciplinary diversity.
‘Our stated mission is to advance research and education in the neurosciences in Ireland, and to represent Irish neuroscience researchers both nationally and internationally.’
How do you promote education and training for neuroscientists?
I sit on the FENS Committee for Higher Education and Training, so this area is a particular interest of mine. We are fortunate to have a talented pool of young researchers in universities throughout the country. We support these researchers in practical ways, by organising annual scientific meetings where they can share results and connect with each other and with international invitees and speakers. Every second year, this meeting takes the form of the Young Neuroscience Symposium mentioned above, which has a special emphasis on mentorship, networking and career development. We also provide travel bursaries to students and early career members to enable them to attend international conferences. All Neuroscience Ireland members are automatically members of FENS, which opens up huge opportunities for training and career development including the FENS summer schools and winter schools and the CAJAL Advanced Neuroscience Training Programme.
Do you provide funding opportunities for researchers?
We are a small society with limited resources, so we don’t have a budget to fund research directly. Instead, we channel our resources into providing funding for conference attendance to help researchers build their networks. We also provide small grants to help researchers host international conferences in Ireland.
In your opinion, what can neuroscience specifically bring to translational research and medicine?
In Ireland alone, over 800,000 people live with neurological conditions such as stroke, epilepsy, Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease and multiple sclerosis and the associated costs are estimated to be €3 billion per annum. This is both a personal and a societal crisis, placing an enormous burden on healthcare systems. I think that improved diagnostics and treatments will only come from the type of interdisciplinary collaboration that characterises neuroscience. In Neuroscience Ireland we recognise this by ensuring disciplinary diversity within our Council membership by including clinicians and clinician-scientists, along with researchers working in basic and preclinical neuroscience research.
At the research level, relatively recent technologies like optogenetics have given neuroscientists better tools to explore and attempt to understand fundamental neurophysiological processes and disease processes. While these have the potential for therapeutic use, their invasive nature is an obvious drawback that must be overcome. But importantly, as has always been the case in scientific research, hypotheses, concepts and theoretical frameworks of understanding need to evolve alongside technologies if newly-discovered mechanistic information is to be applied for human benefit.
‘There will continue to be huge opportunities to apply knowledge from neuroscience research to different aspects of economic or societal activity…this is where scientific communication and public understanding of science are key.’
In recent years, neuroscience has given rise to a range of applied disciplines including neuroeconomics, neuroethics, and neurolaw. What opportunities and challenges do you see on the horizon as a result of this expansion of the application of neuroscience?
Many neuroscientists are very wary of the recent trend for sticking the ‘neuro’ prefix in front of an existing disciplinary name and heralding the arrival of a new discipline. It is not always helpful and can, in fact, be harmful if neuroscience findings are applied in an uninformed, misinformed or premature manner. One clear example here is of the increasing introduction, especially in the USA, of imaging data into the courtroom, where jurors or judges may not have the knowledge to understand the validity of the evidence or the scientific concepts being presented. That being said, there will continue to be huge opportunities to apply knowledge from neuroscience research to different aspects of economic or societal activity. To me, this is where scientific communication and public understanding of science are key. Researchers have a responsibility to communicate their findings to the public directly and in a considered and clear manner. We all have a part to play in ensuring the continuing credibility of scientists and public trust in the scientific enterprise.
Want to republish our articles?
We encourage all formats of sharing and republishing of our articles. Whether you want to host on your website, publication or blog, we welcome this. Find out more
Creative Commons Licence
(CC BY 4.0)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
What does this mean?
Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.
Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.
More articles you may like
Dr Michael Gipp | Unveiling the Past: Using Statistical Computation to Characterise Ancient Climates
Throughout the earth’s history, the prevailing climate has changed over and over. To gain insights into the history of our planet, scientists use clues uncovered from the earth’s surface. However, not all periods in the earth’s history are equally represented in the geological record. Dr Michael Gipp is using the surprising similarities between computer algorithms and complex natural systems to describe our ancient climates.
Dr Cristina Oliva and Professor Giampiero Favato | Unravelling How COVID-19 Mathematics Impact Behaviour Change
Mathematical models for predicting the spread of COVID-19 directly influenced public health measures around the world, significantly impacting everyone’s day-to-day activities. At Kingston University, Dr Cristina Oliva and Professor Giampiero Favato are leading the way in COVID-19 research, looking at how complex statistical data is communicated to the general public. Their valuable work is helping drive changes in behaviour that could reduce the spread of COVID-19.
Professor Nuno Luis Madureira | Fuel Change: Riddles, Paradoxes and Enigmas in Energy Transitions
Throughout history, we have relied on many different energy sources. Initially, wood was used for heating and cooking; as industry grew, we moved to fossil fuels; and the scientific advances of the 20th century allowed us to harness sources such as nuclear, solar and tidal energy. The transition from one fuel type to another has led to the identification of some intriguing paradoxes. Professor Nuno Luis Madureira from the University Institute of Lisbon studies these transitions and is shedding light on this fascinating subject.
Professor Alison Lister | Poking Holes in the Standard Model of Particle Physics
Our understanding of physics changed dramatically in the 20th century, with the advent of the Standard Model of Particle Physics, which builds on quantum mechanics and Einstein’s theory of relativity – two of the most successful theories in the history of science. However, we know that our theories are incomplete, but finding out what’s beyond the Standard Model is difficult because it’s such a successful theory. Professor Alison Lister and her colleagues at the University of British Columbia and around the world are poking holes in the Standard Model, towards finding a new theory that gives a more complete description of the universe.