Dr Ramez Labib – Dr Lisa Hoffman | Evaluating the Environmental Impact of Personal Care Products: The Eco-Innovation Ranking Method

Dec 15, 2023 | Earth & Environmental Sciences

Like many industries, the manufacture of personal care items such as beauty products is increasingly embracing sustainable practices. Dr Ramez Labib and Dr Lisa Hoffman at Avon Products Inc. in the USA have developed an eco-innovation ranking method to support the early stages of product design. Their semi-automated tool is unique in combining a wide range of measures from ecological risk assessment and life cycle assessment to comprehensively assess the environmental impact of products that end up as wastewater.

Sustainable Practice and Personal Care Products

Sustainable practice is increasingly being implemented across different industries. The vast industry dedicated to manufacturing personal care items (such as hair care products, fragrances, and cosmetics) is no exception. There is particular interest in the development of new processes and products with reduced environmental impact, and this is known as eco-innovation.

Many formulated personal care products end up ‘down-the-drain’ as wastewater due to being rinsed off, in the case of shampoo, for example. This means that the aquatic environment (rivers, lakes, oceans, and so on) and the water-dependent species, including fish, plants, and microorganisms that reside there, are vulnerable to potentially toxic and hazardous effects of end-of-life products.

Assessing Environmental Impact

To support eco-innovation, product designers need to be able to evaluate the environmental impact of their products. Two widely used techniques are ecological risk assessment and life cycle assessment. Critical to both is green chemistry, the field of chemical engineering focussed on eliminating (or at least reducing) the use and generation of hazardous substances.

Ecological risk assessment is predominantly used for regulatory decision-making and by some governments to restrict the ingredients used in personal care products. When this happens, companies need to quickly reformulate their product or stop selling it altogether.

Life cycle assessment is the internationally standardised approach to assessing environmental impact. This comprehensive evaluation is time-consuming and resource-intensive to complete but provides more detailed and broader insights into the potential ecological impacts of a product. As such, there is increasing pressure on companies to adopt this approach in their assessments of personal care products. In an effort to develop ‘greener’ product ranges, some companies have been proactive in ascertaining the end-of-life impacts of all the ingredients in their products and not just fragrance compounds and active ingredients as typically undertaken.

The Need for a New Environmental Assessment Tool

Dr Ramez Labib and Dr Lisa Hoffman at Avon Products Inc. in the USA saw the need to be able to obtain comprehensive data via both ecological risk and life cycle assessment during product design to help companies minimise the potentially adverse environmental impacts.

However, a major challenge to this is that personal care products are made from thousands of different ingredients and life cycle data are missing for many of these. Furthermore, at the early stages of the design process, assessments have to rely on what is known about the key chemical properties of the ingredients and foreseeable product use.

Dr Labib and Dr Hoffman worked with Dr Jennifer Saxe (EcoSafety & Sustainability Inc., USA) to develop a new environmental assessment tool incorporating components from both ecological risk assessment and life cycle assessment to support the early design of down-the-drain products. A key aim was to help minimise the risk of new products being reformulated due to regulatory changes in the future.

Selection of Measures: Potential Impact Indicators

The scientists started by reviewing the scientific literature and regulatory models in the public domain to ascertain the potential impact indicators currently available. They ensured their selection of measurements included all ecological risk and life cycle assessment scales that could feasibly be incorporated into the new tool.

The next step was to identify distinct substance classes requiring dedicated and specific environmental assessment. This was achieved by taking representative personal care products, such as shampoos and make-up, and examining the ingredients. The most common ingredient type was classed as ‘non-polymer organic substances’ used either individually or with other similar compounds, and was chosen by the scientists for the initial development of their tool.

The potential impact indicators selected by the researchers include the ecological toxicity during end-of-life exposures, the potential for ground-level photochemical ozone (smog) formation, direct greenhouse gas emissions from the use of the personal care product, and depletion of scarce mineral resources. The concept of ‘persistence’ was included as an independent potential impact indicator, although not technically an environmental impact, in line with the approach taken by Regulators as a proxy measure for exposure and multiple impacts. The aim of this approach is to try to account for complex and unexpected ecosystem impacts that cannot be ascertained on the basis of the extant literature.

The Eco-Innovation Ranking Method

The semi-automated spreadsheet gathers and processes environmental impact data for ingredients and combines the data to produce a single rank value ranging from 1 (best) to 10 (worst) for each ingredient. The tool allows end users to change potential impact indicators as science progresses and priorities change. The scientists illustrated the use of the model with ten shampoos and nine make-up products to confirm its ability to differentiate among formulas.

Application and Implications

Although the scientists have focussed on personal care products, the eco-innovation ranking method can be applied to all down-the-drain products. Importantly, the weighting factors can be readily altered to fit sustainability goals as they emerge and evolve.

The eco-innovation ranking method is unique in combining to promote sustainability at the early product design stage approaches to support early stages of product design. This work will help companies to measure and achieve sustainability objectives, and contribute towards meeting the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals to more effectively manage chemicals throughout their lifecycle and minimise their adverse environmental impacts.






Ramez Labib, PhD, MBA, DABT, ERT
Senior Director, Toxicology
Avon Products Inc.
Suffern, NY

Dr Ramez Labib obtained his PhD (Biomedical Sciences in Pharmacology and Toxicology) in 2002 at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, and an MBA at the New Jersey Institute of Technology in 2012. In 2009, he became a Diplomat of the American Board of Toxicology (recertified in 2019) and in 2014 was recognised as a European Registered Toxicologist. He is a full member of the Society of Toxicology, the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, and the Mid-Atlantic Chapter of the Society of Toxicology. In his role as Senior Director, Toxicology at Avon, Dr Labib oversees a large team of safety professionals and liaises with R&D professionals to drive innovation.

Lisa Hoffman, PhD
Lead of Toxicology and Clinical Safety (Senior Manager)
Avon Products Inc.
Suffern, NY

Dr Lisa Hoffman obtained her PhD in Pharmaceutical Sciences at St. John’s University (New York) in 2015. She has been a European Registered Toxicologist since 2022, is a member of the Society of Toxicology (SOT), the Mid-Atlantic Regional Chapter of SOT (MASOT), and since 2010, a member of the MASOT Education and Outreach Committee. Dr Hoffman re-joined Avon in 2019 as the Manager of Toxicology and Clinical Safety and is currently the Lead of Toxicology and Clinical Safety (Senior Manager) where she leads a team of toxicologists to ensure the safety of consumer products in all areas of cosmetics, fragrances, and toiletries


Dr Jennifer K. Saxe, EcoSafety & Sustainability Inc.


Avon Products International funded this work.


JK Saxe, L Hoffman, R Labib, Method to incorporate green chemistry principles in early-stage product design for sustainability: case studies with personal care products, Green Chemistry, 2022, 24, 4969–4980. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/D2GC00842D


We encourage all formats of sharing and republishing of our articles. Whether you want to host on your website, publication or blog, we welcome this. Find out more

Creative Commons Licence (CC BY 4.0)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Creative Commons License

What does this mean?

Share: You can copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format

Adapt: You can change, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially.

Credit: You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made.


Follow Us


Dr Timothy Beers | Mapping the Galaxy’s Stellar Populations Using Large Photometric and Astrometric Surveys

Dr Timothy Beers | Mapping the Galaxy’s Stellar Populations Using Large Photometric and Astrometric Surveys

Astronomers often use spectroscopic (electromagnetic radiation) data and astrometric (motion and positional) data to develop working models describing our Galaxy. Dr Timothy Beers from the University of Notre Dame and his collaborators in Korea and China combined large photometric (visible light) surveys and astrometric data to create multidimensional maps of a large part of the Galaxy. By highlighting significant inhomogeneities in stellar-chemical compositions, motions, and spatial distributions, Dr Beers and his colleagues provide valuable insights into how we can advance our understanding of the formation and evolution of our Galaxy.

Professor Gary Yohe | Navigating Climate Change: The Impactful Contributions of Gary Yohe

Professor Gary Yohe | Navigating Climate Change: The Impactful Contributions of Gary Yohe

Professor Gary Yohe is a distinguished environmental economist whose work has been pivotal in shaping our understanding of climate change impacts, adaptation strategies, and policy frameworks. His interdisciplinary approach combines economics with environmental science, offering nuanced insights into global warming and its multifaceted impacts on natural and human systems. Professor Yohe equips us with the knowledge and strategies needed to navigate the complex and pressing challenges posed by climate change.

Dr Sebastian Fraune | Microbiota: Fast-tracking Adaptation to Rapidly Changing Environments

Dr Sebastian Fraune | Microbiota: Fast-tracking Adaptation to Rapidly Changing Environments

As climate change continues at an unprecedented pace, the processes of natural selection and genetic mutation can no longer fully explain how some organisms adapt to their rapidly changing environments. Dr Sebastian Fraune from Heinrich-Heine University and an international team of researchers are the first to demonstrate a causal relationship between changes in the microbiome and changes in thermal tolerance. They propose that microbiota-mediated transgenerational acclimatisation can account for how animals adapt to their environments in much shorter periods of time than classical theory would predict.

Dr Attila Borovics | Mitigating Climate Change: The ForestLab Project

Dr Attila Borovics | Mitigating Climate Change: The ForestLab Project

Our forests provide important recreational, social, ecological and economic functions. The ForestLab project, led by Dr Attila Borovics at the University of Sopron in Hungary, has been set up to simultaneously protect and utilise this pre-cious resource. Their recent findings point to the importance of addressing ‘old wood’, that is, unused wood stock that currently exists in Hungarian forests and adopting technologies for forest management in the near future.